U.S. imposing a worldwide dictatorship by President George W Bush and his inner circle are taking steps to place America on the path to war with Iran and also Mr Bush's inner circle has decided he does not want to leave office without first ensuring a war with Iran. Pentagon and CIA officers say they believe that the White House has begun a carefully calibrated programme of escalation that could lead to a military showdown with Iran. One is to bomb only the nuclear facilities. The second option is for a much bigger strike that would over two or three days hit all of the significant military sites as well. This plan involves more than 2,000 targets. The US also announced the creation of a new base near the Iraqi border town of Badra. Now it has emerged that Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, who has been pushing for a diplomatic solution, is prepared to settle her differences with Vice-President Dick Cheney and sanction military action. Miss Rice, under pressure from senior counter-proliferation officials to acknowledge that military action may be necessary, is now working with Mr Cheney to find a way to reconcile their positions and present a united front to the President.
As the American disaster in Iraq deepens and domestic and foreign opposition grows, "neo-con" fanatics such as Vice-President Dick Cheney believe their opportunity to control Iran's oil will pass unless they attack. Unlike its two nemeses, the US and Israel, Iran has attacked no other countries. It last went to war in 1980 when invaded by Saddam Hussein, who was backed and equipped by the US, which supplied chemical and biological weapons produced at a factory in Maryland. Unlike Israel, the world's fifth military power - with its thermo nuclear weapons aimed at Middle East targets and an unmatched record of defying UN resolutions, as the enforcer of the world's longest illegal occupation. Iran has a history of obeying international law and occupies no territory other than its own. The "threat" from Iran is entirely manufactured just like the one by Iraq, aided and abetted by familiar, compliant media language that refers to Iran's "nuclear ambitions", just as the vocabulary of Saddam's non-existent WMD arsenal became common usage. Accompanying this is a demonising that has become standard practice.
The one piece of "solid evidence" is the threat posed by the United States and they're greatest of intentions and they may feel that they are doing good for humanity, but they fail to understand that they are no more than instruments of one more empire in a long list of empires that have been imposed on our planet. The world is under "the most impressive, huge dictatorship that has existed the empire of North America,United States, as the only country to have used nuclear bombs in a war. An American naval build-up in the eastern Mediterranean has begun. This is almost certainly part of what the Pentagon calls CONPLAN 8022-02, which is the aerial bombing of Iran. In 2004, National Security Presidential Directive 35, entitled "Nuclear Weapons Deployment Authorisation", was issued. It is classified, of course, but the presumption has long been that NSPD 35 authorised the stockpiling and deployment of "tactical" nuclear weapons in the Middle East. This does not mean Bush will use them against Iran, but for the first time since the most dangerous years of the cold war, the use of what were then called "limited" nuclear weapons is being discussed openly in Washington. What they are debating is the prospect of other Hiroshimas and of radioactive fallout across the Middle East and central Asia.
The well-informed Arab Times in Kuwait says that Bush will attack Iran. One of Russia's most senior military strategists, General Leonid Ivashov, says the US will use nuclear munitions delivered by cruise missiles launched from the Mediterranean. "The war in Iraq," he wrote on 24 January, "was just one element in a series of steps in the process of regional destabilisation. It was only a phase in getting closer to dealing with Iran and other countries. When the attack on Iran begins Israel is sure to come under Iranian missile strikes. Posing as victims, the Israelis will suffer some tolerable damage and then the outraged US will destabilise Iran finally, making it look like a noble mission of retribution. Public opinion is already under pressure. There will be a growing anti-Iranian hysteria, leaks, disinformation ect. Do not let this goverment full you, we do not need another war. Can't you see this is another false propaganda to control the oil and to control the world. No more war, no war on Iran.
As the American disaster in Iraq deepens and domestic and foreign opposition grows, "neo-con" fanatics such as Vice-President Dick Cheney believe their opportunity to control Iran's oil will pass unless they attack. Unlike its two nemeses, the US and Israel, Iran has attacked no other countries. It last went to war in 1980 when invaded by Saddam Hussein, who was backed and equipped by the US, which supplied chemical and biological weapons produced at a factory in Maryland. Unlike Israel, the world's fifth military power - with its thermo nuclear weapons aimed at Middle East targets and an unmatched record of defying UN resolutions, as the enforcer of the world's longest illegal occupation. Iran has a history of obeying international law and occupies no territory other than its own. The "threat" from Iran is entirely manufactured just like the one by Iraq, aided and abetted by familiar, compliant media language that refers to Iran's "nuclear ambitions", just as the vocabulary of Saddam's non-existent WMD arsenal became common usage. Accompanying this is a demonising that has become standard practice.
The one piece of "solid evidence" is the threat posed by the United States and they're greatest of intentions and they may feel that they are doing good for humanity, but they fail to understand that they are no more than instruments of one more empire in a long list of empires that have been imposed on our planet. The world is under "the most impressive, huge dictatorship that has existed the empire of North America,United States, as the only country to have used nuclear bombs in a war. An American naval build-up in the eastern Mediterranean has begun. This is almost certainly part of what the Pentagon calls CONPLAN 8022-02, which is the aerial bombing of Iran. In 2004, National Security Presidential Directive 35, entitled "Nuclear Weapons Deployment Authorisation", was issued. It is classified, of course, but the presumption has long been that NSPD 35 authorised the stockpiling and deployment of "tactical" nuclear weapons in the Middle East. This does not mean Bush will use them against Iran, but for the first time since the most dangerous years of the cold war, the use of what were then called "limited" nuclear weapons is being discussed openly in Washington. What they are debating is the prospect of other Hiroshimas and of radioactive fallout across the Middle East and central Asia.
The well-informed Arab Times in Kuwait says that Bush will attack Iran. One of Russia's most senior military strategists, General Leonid Ivashov, says the US will use nuclear munitions delivered by cruise missiles launched from the Mediterranean. "The war in Iraq," he wrote on 24 January, "was just one element in a series of steps in the process of regional destabilisation. It was only a phase in getting closer to dealing with Iran and other countries. When the attack on Iran begins Israel is sure to come under Iranian missile strikes. Posing as victims, the Israelis will suffer some tolerable damage and then the outraged US will destabilise Iran finally, making it look like a noble mission of retribution. Public opinion is already under pressure. There will be a growing anti-Iranian hysteria, leaks, disinformation ect. Do not let this goverment full you, we do not need another war. Can't you see this is another false propaganda to control the oil and to control the world. No more war, no war on Iran.
0 comments:
Post a Comment